The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court's determinations concerning identification and credibility. The undercover officer had ample opportunity to observe defendant during the transaction and provided a detailed and accurate description. The totality of defendant's conduct clearly warranted an inference of accessorial liability (see, People v Bello,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. BROWN
284 A.D.2d 279 (2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 851
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DARREN BROWN, Also Known as DANTE QUINONES, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 28, 2001.
Decided June 28, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
