1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 279 A.D.2d
  5. 279 A.D.2d 278 (2001)
 

PEOPLE v. MONEGRO

279 A.D.2d 278 (2001)

718 N.Y.S.2d 823

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JUAN MONEGRO, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided January 9, 2001.

The court's compromise Sandoval ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People v Walker, 83 N.Y.2d 455, 458-459).

The court properly denied defendant's request for new counsel, made as the trial was about to commence. Defendant's conclusory attacks on counsel's performance did not constitute good cause for the desired substitution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases