1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 20 N.J.
  5. 20 N.J. Tax 35 (2001)
 

CENTORINO v. TEWKSBURY TP.

20 N.J. Tax 35 (2001)

MARIANNE CENTORINO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TEWKSBURY TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. TEWKSBURY TOWNSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MARIANNE CENTORINO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division.

Decided December 27, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven R. Irwin, West Orange, argued the cause for Marianne Centorino (Mandelbaum & Mandelbaum, attorneys; Mr. Irwin, on the brief).

Judith A. Kopen, Clinton, argued the cause for Tewksbury Township (Gebhardt & Kiefer, attorneys; Arthur D. Fialk, Bridgewater, on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, KESTIN and ALLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.

These consolidated appeals implicate the applicability and scope of the Supreme Court's decision in West Milford v. Van Decker, 120 N.J. 354, 576 A.2d 881 (1990). The homeowner, Marianne Centorino, challenged her 1998 and 1999 assessment increases on the grounds that they were based on her recent purchase of the property and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases