In an order dated June 8, 2000, this Court affirmed the severance of the second third-party action brought against Gateway Demolition, observing that "[t]he delay in commencing the second third-party action * * * was sufficiently prejudicial, both to plaintiff and Gateway, to support the motion court's exercise of discretion in granting the motion to sever the second third-party action" (Seay v Stateside Constr. Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SEAY v. STATESIDE CONSTRUCTION CORP.
282 A.D.2d 268 (2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 871
JOHNNY SEAY, Plaintiff, v. STATESIDE CONSTRUCTION CORP., Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.) GEORGE A. FULLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Second Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. GATEWAY DEMOLITION CORPORATION, Second Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. (And Another Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 12, 2001.
Decided April 12, 2001.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.