Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that he was entitled to a separate trial from that of his codefendants is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move for that relief in the Supreme Court. In any event, since the same evidence was required in the cases against the defendant and his codefendants, conducting separate trials would have constituted a waste of judicial time and resources (see, People v Becker,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.