Since the arbitration clauses of the subject insurance policies limit arbitration to controversies pertaining to issues of fault and damages, the question of whether plaintiff is entitled to offset any supplemental underinsured motorist benefits to which defendant may be entitled under his policies with Travelers by the amount of workers' compensation benefits paid, or to be paid, to defendant, is for the court to determine (Matter of Rosenbaum [American Sur. Co.],
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY CORP. v. SARANITI
286 A.D.2d 256 (2001)
728 N.Y.S.2d 664
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY CORP., Appellant, v. STEPHEN SARANITI, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided August 16, 2001.
Decided August 16, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
