CITY OF NEW YORK v. STATE OF NEW YORK


284 A.D.2d 255 (2001)

726 N.Y.S.2d 560

CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided June 26, 2001.


The Court of Claims, relying on this Court's decision in City of New York v Maul (239 A.D.2d 225), correctly found that this action is properly before it (see, Court of Claims Act § 9 [2]), even though the subject so-ordered stipulation was originally before Supreme Court. The parties' so-ordered stipulation is not invalid for lack of approval by the State Comptroller; under the circumstances of this case, the so-ordered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases