The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's mistrial motions based on allegedly inflammatory remarks by two prosecution witnesses. These remarks were not unduly prejudicial and the court's curative actions were sufficient to prevent any prejudice (see, People v Santiago,
We perceive no basis for reduction of defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.