1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 37 S.W.3d
  5. 37 S.W.3d 500 (2001)
 

WARD v. EMMETT

No. 04-99-00789-CV.

37 S.W.3d 500 (2001)

Margaret WARD, Appellant, v. Frank E. EMMETT, Ph.D. and Joel Y. Rutman, M.D., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.

January 3, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter J. Stanton, Law Offices of Peter J. Stanton, San Antonio, for appellant.

Charles A. Deacon, Lori C. Ferguson, Renee Forinash McElhaney, Rosemarie Kanusky, W. Wendall Hall, Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P., San Antonio, Linda C. Breck, Thomas F. Nye, Brin & Brin, P.C., Corpus Christi, George Brin, Brin & Brin, P.C., San Antonio, M. Kenneth Patterson, Nik A. Minari, Patterson & Wagner, L.L.P., San Antonio, for appellees.

Sitting: PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice, PAUL W. GREEN, Justice, KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.

OPINION

Opinion by: KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.

Margaret Ward appeals from the granting of a summary judgment. In three issues, she asserts that Frank E. Emmett, Ph.D. and Joel Y. Rutman, M.D. failed to establish their entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law. We affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Margaret Ward (Ward) suffered from mental and behavioral problems for years. Ward's parents purchased health insurance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases