CLARK v. PIMIENTA

No. 99-1131.

47 S.W.3d 485 (2001)

Michael L. CLARK, Petitioner, v. Hugo E. PIMIENTA, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Texas.

April 26, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Helen A. Cassidy, Holman Law Firm, Houston, for Petitioner.

Bryan Coleman, Houston, J. Martin Green, Green & Green, Beaumont, Emil Lippe, Jr., Law Office of Lippe & Associates, Dallas, James L. Reed, Looper Reed Mark & McGraw, Houston, for Respondents.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioner sued numerous defendants on various claims. Two groups of defendants filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted one motion with an order that was undisputedly interlocutory. About six months later, the trial court granted the other motion with an order captioned "Partial Summary Judgment", but which contained a "Mother Hubbard" clause—"All relief not expressly granted herein is denied." Two and one-half years later, a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases