1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 31 P.3d
  5. 31 P.3d 499 (2001)
 

CTY. EMPLOYEES UNION v. MULTNOMAH CTY.

9802-01414; A107076 (Control) and A108717

31 P.3d 499 (2001)

176 Or. App. 323

MULTNOMAH COUNTY EMPLOYEES UNION, Local 88, AFSCME AFL-CIO, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 29, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacqueline A. Weber, Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With her on the briefs was Thomas Sponsler, County Attorney.

Kevin Keaney, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for respondent-cross-appellant.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.

KISTLER, J.

Plaintiff filed this action seeking a declaration that Multnomah County was violating ORS 181.6531 by allowing noncertified employees to perform tasks that only certified parole and probation officers may perform. Plaintiff also sought an injunction prohibiting future violations. The trial court ruled in plaintiff's favor. The county appeals, arguing that the trial court interpreted ORS 181.653 too broadly. Plaintiff cross...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases