1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 190 Misc.2d
  5. 190 Misc.2d 335 (2001)
 

FORT HAMILTON v. BAY RIDGE

190 Misc.2d 335 (2001)

737 N.Y.S.2d 511

In the Matter of FORT HAMILTON DEVELOPMENT CORP. et al., Petitioners, v. BAY RIDGE TOWERS, INC., et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Kings County.

December 12, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eiseman, Levine, Lebraupt & Kako, New York City, for petitioners.

Brauner, Baron, Rosenzweig & Klein LLP, New York City, for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MELVIN S. BARASCH, J.

In this proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law §§ 611 and 619, petitioners Fort Hamilton Development Corp. (Fort Hamilton), Mark P. Madias, and Peter M. Madias (collectively, petitioners) move, by order to show cause, for an order: (1) certifying that petitioners Peter M. Madias and Mark P. Madias, respondents Martin Spencer and James Gallo,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases