1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 206 F.Supp.2d
  5. 206 F.Supp.2d 301 (2001)
 

SCHMIDT v. DEVINO

No. 3:99-CV-555(JGM).

206 F.Supp.2d 301 (2001)

Donald SCHMIDT et al. v. Kenneth DEVINO et al.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

March 30, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Brennan, Brennan & Isaac, Waterbury, CT, for Donald Schmidt, plaintiff.

James P. Brennan, (see above), for Robert P. Hanahan, plaintiff.

Frederick W. Krug, Matzkin, Krug & Danen, P.C., Waterbury, CT, for Kenneth Devino, defendant.

Frederick W. Krug, (see above), for Devino Fuels, Inc., defendant.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

MARGOLIS, United States Magistrate Judge.

On March 25, 1999, plaintiff Donald Schmidt ["Schmidt"] commenced this action against defendants Kenneth Devino ["Devino"] and Devino Fuels, Inc. ["Devino Fuels"] for an alleged wiretapping of plaintiff's workplace telephone. The complaint asserts four claims: violation of the Omnibus Crime Control Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq. (First Cause of Action), violation of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases