The motion was properly denied on the ground that appellants could not have reasonably expected that respondents' attorneys would withhold from respondents information imparted by appellants in the context of litigation in which appellants and respondents were jointly represented by the attorneys and involving business entities in which appellants and respondents were jointly interested (see, Talvy v American Red Cross,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MEYERS v. LIPMAN
284 A.D.2d 207 (2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 547
MARTIN MEYERS et al., Appellants, v. SAMUEL LIPMAN et al., Respondents. In the Matter of the Dissolution of MANHATTAN PARKING—1350 CORP. et al., Respondents. MARTIN MEYERS et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 19, 2001.
Decided June 19, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
