ROBERTS v. LAUGHLIN

C990881CV; A111255

31 P.3d 453 (2001)

176 Or. App. 227

Rebecca ROBERTS, Appellant, v. David LAUGHLIN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 22, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel S. DeVore, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Luvaas, Cobb, Richards & Fraser, P.C.

Andrew Reilly, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Aronson and Schulte, Anderson, Downes, Aronson & Bittner, P.C.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and BREWER and SCHUMAN, Judges.


BREWER, J.

This case presents yet another variation on the familiar problem of assessing the adequacy of service of summons and complaint within the period required by the statute of limitations. Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant on the grounds that plaintiff failed to comply with the provisions of ORCP 7 D(4), governing actions involving motor vehicles, and that plaintiff's collective service efforts did not satisfy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases