RICHARDSON v. GRAY


284 A.D.2d 198 (2001)

726 N.Y.S.2d 105

BENJAMIN RICHARDSON et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. RICHARD E. GRAY et al., Respondents-Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) BENJAMIN RICHARDSON et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. RICHARD E. GRAY et al., Respondents-Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided June 14, 2001.


Although confirming the finding that Gray, through his access to certain properties, had the financial ability to purge a prior contempt order, and that his failure to do so was "another example in the continuing pattern of bad faith demonstrated by him since the commencement of this litigation," the court abused its discretion in failing to impose additional, coercive sanctions, as contemplated in the original adjudication of contempt, for Richard E. Gray's and RAC's flagrant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases