CADIZ LAND CO., INC. v. RAIL CYCLE, L.P.

Nos. E024373, E024532.

99 Cal.Rptr.2d 378 (2001)

83 Cal.App.4th 74

CADIZ LAND COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RAIL CYCLE, L.P., et al., Defendants and Respondents. Cadiz Land Company, Inc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. County of San Bernardino et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

August 18, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro, Benjamin M. Reznik, John M. Bowman, Los Angeles, John E. Mackel, San Francisco, and Lynne Todd Edgerton, Sacramento, for Plaintiff and Appellant and for Plaintiff and Respondent.

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, Richard R. Terzian, Stephen P. Pfahler and Robert J. Tyson, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Appellants.

Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, Nabil L. Abu-Assal, Tonie M. Franzese, Los Angeles, David J. Altman and Clare Bronowski, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

GAUT, J.

Appellant Cadiz Land Company, Inc. (Cadiz)1 challenges under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)2 the County of San Bernardino's certification of an environmental impact report and related approval of Rail Cycle, L.P.'s proposed landfill project (landfill).3 The proposed landfill site is located...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases