Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. Defendant and his group met a description of assailants that was sufficiently specific and accurate under the geographic and temporal circumstances to give the officers reasonable suspicion to stop and detain them on the street (see, People v Hicks,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ORTIZ
284 A.D.2d 187 (2001)
727 N.Y.S.2d 411
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SHANNON ORTIZ, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 14, 2001.
Decided June 14, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.