Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly declined to limit the testimony on the issue of damages to the events which transpired after the arraignment of the plaintiff Paul J. G. (hereinafter the plaintiff), and permitted testimony about the events following his arrest. The Supreme Court correctly determined that the plaintiff's arrest and confinement, followed by the arraignment, initiated the underlying criminal proceeding for...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.