1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 19 P.3d
  5. 19 P.3d 448 (2001)
 

BISHOP v. HANSEN

No. 45471-4-I.

19 P.3d 448 (2001)

105 Wash.App. 116

Roy E. BISHOP and David A. Milot-Metro Realty d/b/a Re/Max Metro, Respondents, v. James J. HANSEN and Elsie M. Hansen, husband and wife, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

March 5, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Jennings Jameson, Mill Creek, for Appellants.

Jonathan S. Smith, Seattle, for Respondent.

BECKER, A.C.J.

To satisfy the statute of frauds for a real estate brokerage agreement, the written agreement must specify how the broker is to be paid. If the broker is to receive a commission based on the sales price of the property, the listing price is not a necessary term and its absence will not invalidate the agreement.

Appellants Elsie and James Hansen entered into an exclusive real estate listing agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases