1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 106 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 106 Cal.Rptr.2d 361 (2001)
 

ACOSTA v. SYNTHETIC INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. B143381.

106 Cal.Rptr.2d 361 (2001)

88 Cal.App.4th 944

Rogelio ACOSTA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SYNTHETIC INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant and Respondent. Luis Alvarez et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Synthetic Industries, Inc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

Review Granted August 15, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee A. Freeman and Associates and Lee A. Freeman, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Richard DeNatale, San Francisco, Michael T. Williams, Los Angeles, and Jilana L. Miller; Murchison & Cumming, Friedrich W. Seitz, and Edmund G. Farrell, III, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent.

CHARLES S. VOGEL, P.J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs are numerous homeowners in the California Marquis housing development. Defendant Synthetic Industries, Inc., is a manufacturer of Fibermesh, a secondary reinforcer added to the concrete. It was used in the construction of the slab foundations for homes purchased by the plaintiffs.1 The trial court granted two separate motions for summary adjudication. One disposed of plaintiffs'...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases