We are asked to clarify the evidentiary standard that a plaintiff with a chapter 49.60 RCW employment discrimination claim must meet to survive a motion for judgment as a matter of law. The Court of Appeals adopted the so-called "pretext-plus" standard, which was recently rejected by the United States Supreme Court in Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HILL v. BCTI INCOME FUND-I
No. 68783-8.
23 P.3d 440 (2001)
Eleanor HILL, a single woman, Petitioner, v. BCTI INCOME FUND-I, a Washington limited partnership, d/b/a/ Business Computer Training Institute, a Washington corporation; John Doe and Jane Doe I-X, d/b/a BCTI Associates; Business Computer Training Institute, Inc., a corporation, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued October 17, 2000.
Decided May 17, 2001.
As Amended on Denial of Reconsideration July 17, 2001.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Keating, Bucklin & McCormack, Stewart Andrew Estes, Seattle, Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Washington Defense Trial Lawyers.
Krilich, La Porte, West & Lockner, Thomas Joseph West, Philip I. Brennan, Jr., Tacoma, for Petitioner.
Lane, Powell, Spears & Lubersky, Michael Barr King, Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler & Krupman, Wayne W. Hansen, Seattle, for Respondents.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
