The verdicts were based on legally sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. While defendant Valentin challenges the sufficiency of the evidence of his accessorial liability, the totality of the course of defendants' conduct clearly establishes that Valentin was a participant in this attempted taxicab robbery (see, People v Chalwell,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. VALENTIN
289 A.D.2d 172 (2001)
735 N.Y.S.2d 58
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LOUIS VALENTIN, Appellant. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL COTTO, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 27, 2001.
Decided December 27, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
