1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 25 P.3d
  5. 25 P.3d 436 (2001)
 

STATE v. SCHULTZ

No. 45982-1-I.

25 P.3d 436 (2001)

106 Wash.App. 328

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Karl Alan SCHULTZ, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

Publication Ordered June 1, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nielson, Broman & Associates, PLLC, by John E. Gibson, Taholah, and Eric Broman, for appellant.

Snohomish County Prosecutor's Office, by Seth A. Fine, Everett, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

A preconviction no-contact order can serve as the basis for a criminal prosecution if the violation occurred within the period in which the order is effective, and even after conviction of the underlying assault. The preconviction order in this case was valid even after conviction. Accordingly, we reject Schultz's contention that the State failed to prove the validity of the order beyond a reasonable doubt. The conviction is affirmed.

FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases