1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 31 P.3d
  5. 31 P.3d 427 (2001)
 

OXLEY v. MYERS

SC S48714, S48715, S48716

31 P.3d 427 (2001)

332 Or. 468

Gary F. OXLEY, Petitioner, v. Hardy MYERS, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent, and Tim Nesbitt, Intervenor.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided August 30, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David H. Remes, pro hac vice, Washington, DC, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the petition were James N. Gardner and Lynda N. Gardner, of Gardner & Gardner, Portland.

Erika L. Hadlock, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the answering memorandum were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Lynn-Marie Crider, Salem, filed an answering memorandum for intervenor.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, LEESON, RIGGS, and De MUNIZ, Justices.

PER CURIAM.

These three ballot title review proceedings, which have been consolidated for argument and opinion, are brought under ORS 250.085(2) and concern the Attorney General's certified ballot titles for proposed initiative measures denominated by the Secretary of State as Initiative Petitions 61, 62, and 63 (2002). Petitioner is an elector who timely submitted written comments to the Secretary of State concerning the content of the Attorney General's draft ballot...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases