Defendant's claim that the arresting officer bolstered the undercover officer's identification testimony is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find no basis for reversal since police testimony as to a confirmatory drive-by identification by an undercover officer provides a necessary explanation of the events which precipitated defendant's arrest and does not constitute
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ESTRELLA
288 A.D.2d 159 (2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 353
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAUL ESTRELLA, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 29, 2001.
Decided November 29, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
