1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 31 P.3d
  5. 31 P.3d 414 (2001)
 

IN RE KIMMELL

(OSB No. 98-82; SC S47464)

31 P.3d 414 (2001)

332 Or. 480

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF Adam KIMMELL, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reassigned June 20, 2001.

Decided August 30, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adam Kimmell, in propria persona, Portland, argued the cause and submitted the brief.

Mary A. Cooper, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and submitted the brief for the Oregon State Bar.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, LEESON, RIGGS, and De MUNIZ, Justices.

PER CURIAM.

In this lawyer discipline proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with violating two disciplinary rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility: Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(2) (prohibiting commission of "criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness to practice law"); and DR 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting "engag[ing] in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation"). The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases