CLASSIC COACH v. MERCADO


280 A.D.2d 164 (2001)

722 N.Y.S.2d 551

In the Matter of CLASSIC COACH et al., Appellants, v. EDWARD MERCADO, as Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights, et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 19, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Franklin, Gringer & Lipp, P. C., Garden City (Robert G. Lipp of counsel), for appellants.

Gina M. Lopez, New York City (Michael K. Swirsky of counsel), for Edward Mercado, respondent.

John J. Andrews, Port Jefferson (Edward Cherney of counsel), for Carol Aurecchione, respondent.

SANTUCCI, S. MILLER and FLORIO, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

BRACKEN, P. J.

The issue in this case is whether a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights (hereinafter the Commissioner), that the complainant had been subjected to an illegal discriminatory practice in violation of Executive Law § 296, is supported by substantial evidence. We conclude that it is so supported and confirm the determination.

The Commissioner found in his determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases