The court properly precluded defendant from eliciting from an officer that, upon his arrest, defendant requested that a fingerprint analysis be performed on the imitation pistol in question. In any event, the court's ruling could not have caused defendant any prejudice, particularly since defendant was permitted to introduce similar evidence during his own testimony.
The court properly exercised its discretion (see, People v Duncan,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
