1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 112 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 112 Cal.Rptr.2d 329 (2001)
 

DEBRO v. LOS ANGELES RAIDERS

No. A094248.

112 Cal.Rptr.2d 329 (2001)

92 Cal.App.4th 940

Joseph DEBRO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. The LOS ANGELES RAIDERS, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

Review Denied January 23, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Counsel for Appellant: Joseph Debro, in pro per.

Counsel for Respondent: Kenneth G. Hausman, Kevin H. Lewis, Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, San Francisco.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

STEVENS, J.

Joseph Debro (Debro) appeals from a judgment following the sustaining of respondent's demurrer to his second amended complaint without leave to amend. Debro contends the trial court erred because one of his causes of action, based on the California False Claims Act (Gov.Code, §§ 12650-12655), was not time-barred. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

I. FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases