In view of appellant's larcenous conduct, his history of truancy, disruptive behavior problems, and the recommendation submitted by the evaluating psychiatrist that appellant was in need of placement in a structured environment, as well as appellant's failure, while on parole, to cooperate with community-based programs, the court's disposition was a proper exercise of discretion. We conclude that the court adopted the least restrictive alternative consistent with appellant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
