281 A.D.2d 158 (2001)

721 N.Y.S.2d 344

ANTHONY HARRIS, Appellant, v. MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ et al., Respondents. TIME WARNER CABLE OF NEW YORK CITY, a Division of TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT CO., L. L. P., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. QUEENS CABLE CONTRACTORS, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided March 1, 2001.

Plaintiff asserts that he fell when the roof of a shed upon which he was sitting, while attaching television cable to a box on an adjacent pole, collapsed. Plaintiff's employer supplied him with a 24-foot ladder, which plaintiff testified that he wanted to use for the job. However, he and his partner left the ladder on their truck on the street, because they could not safely transport it either through the house or through the alley way, to the cable pole behind the house. Plaintiff alleges that to accomplish the job, he was therefore required to climb onto the roof.

Plaintiff's testimony at two depositions that he could not get the ladder into position (1) because there was shrubbery blocking access, and (2) because there was accumulated debris in the alleyway, does not require a finding that plaintiff was a "recalcitrant worker," to whom the protections of Labor Law § 240 (1) do not apply. The recalcitrant worker defense requires a showing of the "injured worker's deliberate refusal to use available and visible safety devices in place at the work station" (Powers v Del Zotto & Son Bldrs., 266 A.D.2d 668, 671 [emphasis supplied]; Kaffke v New York State Elec. & Gas Corp., 257 A.D.2d 840; Davis v Board of Trustees of Hicksville Pub. Lib., 240 A.D.2d 461; Tennant v Curcio, 237 A.D.2d 733; Heath v Soloff Constr., 107 A.D.2d 507). There was no evidence here that plaintiff deliberately refused to use a safety device. Accordingly, the claims under Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) are reinstated.


1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases