Summary judgment was properly granted. In view of the absence of evidence contradicting or otherwise raising a material question as to those portions of plaintiff's deposition testimony in which she repeatedly states that her accident occurred on third-party plaintiffs' premises, there existed no triable issue as to the site of plaintiff's accident warranting denial of third-party defendant's cross motion for summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEREZ v. MODINA LIVE POULTRY, INC.
284 A.D.2d 150 (2001)
725 N.Y.S.2d 549
MERCEDES PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. MODINA LIVE POULTRY, INC., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. CITY OF NEW YORK, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (And Another Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 7, 2001.
Decided June 7, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
