1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 23 P.3d
  5. 23 P.3d 411 (2001)
 

SAIF v. LEDIN

99-03403; CA A110298

23 P.3d 411 (2001)

174 Or. App. 61

In the Matter of the Compensation of Larry L. Ledin, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Leo Carignan, Petitioners, v. Larry L. LEDIN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 2, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julene Marian Quinn argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Gordon Gannicott, Portland argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Hollander, Lebenbaum & Gannicott.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and KISTLER and SCHUMAN, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

SAIF seeks review of a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board that required it to reopen claimant's claim to process a new medical condition rather than treating that new condition as a claim within the Board's own motion jurisdiction. In Johansen v. SAIF, 158 Or.App. 672, 976 P.2d 84, on recons. 160 Or.App. 579,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases