Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The only rational inference that may be drawn from the evidence is that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest defendant for an undercover drug sale on the basis of information shared among the members of the arresting officer's team, who had been working closely together (see, People v Gonzalez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. JONES
289 A.D.2d 136 (2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 448
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID JONES, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 20, 2001.
Decided December 20, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.