1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 19 P.3d
  5. 19 P.3d 406 (2001)
 

HAYWOOD v. ARANDA

Nos. 68868-1, 68905-9.

19 P.3d 406 (2001)

143 Wash.2d 231

Wendy HAYWOOD, individually, Plaintiff, Deborah Hittle, individually, Petitioner, v. Ildefonsa ARANDA and Jane Doe Aranda, husband and wife, Respondents. Mary K. Creso, Petitioner, v. Lauri J. Philips, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided March 15, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Williamson Talbot, Tacoma, for petitioner Hittle.

Law Offices of Ben F. Barcus, Paul Alexander Lindenmuth, Tacoma, for petitioner Creso.

Anthony Joseph Vidlak, Reed, McClure, Marilee C. Erickson, William Robert Hickman, Seattle, David Hadley Middleton, Federal Way, for respondents.

ALEXANDER, C.J.

In Nevers v. Fireside, Inc., 133 Wn.2d 804, 947 P.2d 721 (1997), this court held that in order for a party to obtain a trial de novo following mandatory arbitration of a civil action, the party seeking the trial must strictly comply with MAR 7.1 and timely file proof of service of the request for trial de novo. In the two cases before us we are presented with an issue that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases