WILEY v. REHAK

No. 70008-7.

20 P.3d 404 (2001)

143 Wash.2d 339

Leslie WILEY, Respondent, v. Frank REHAK, Dana Rehak, Defendants. Kevin Prueitt, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided March 29, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Krilich, La Porte & West, Dennis J. La Porte, Philip I. Brennan, Jr., Tacoma, for Petitioner.

Morse & Bratt, Ben Shafton, Vancouver, for Respondent.


IRELAND, J.

This Court granted review of a Court of Appeals' decision (1) holding that Kevin Prueitt could not amend a notice for trial de novo following mandatory arbitration to add himself as a named party after the time for filing the notice had expired and (2) assessing attorney fees against Kevin Prueitt. The Court of Appeals' decision is consistent with our case law and should be affirmed.

FACTS

The central facts in this case are undisputed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases