Defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied without a hearing. The information presented to the motion court clearly established that the viewing of defendant by the observing officer in this observation sale case was a confirmatory identification for which no Wade hearing was required (see, People v Wharton,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. DAVIS
289 A.D.2d 134 (2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 447
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CLARENCE DAVIS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 20, 2001.
Decided December 20, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.