The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the weight to be given the victim's prior inconsistent statements and the reasonableness of his explanations for those statements, were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis upon which to disturb its determinations.
The challenged portions of the prosecutor's summation constituted fair comment on the evidence and there was no pattern of egregious conduct warranting...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.