Defendant, who was convicted of reckless assault (Penal Law § 120.00 [2]), failed to preserve his claim that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he acted recklessly and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that even under defendant's version of the incident, defendant's act of striking his dog, with great force, while it was in close proximity to his infant son constituted conscious disregard of a substantial...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
