HUXFORD v. ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES DIV.

DU5021; CA A103247

23 P.3d 390 (2001)

174 Or. App. 1

Kay HUXFORD, Petitioner, v. ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 2, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen Berkowitz, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs was Legal Aid Service of Oregon.

David J. Amesbury, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and LINDER, Judges.


EDMONDS, P.J.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD) that dismissed her request for a hearing on AFSD's refusal to make two lease payments on her car. She used the car for transportation while she was participating in self-sufficiency activities that were a requirement for receiving public assistance. AFSD held that support payments that are intended to assist aid recipients in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases