1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 33 P.3d
  5. 33 P.3d 379 (2001)
 

HINTON v. HANNIGAN

98-559; A108340

33 P.3d 379 (2001)

177 Or. App. 196

David L. HINTON and Patricia D. Hinton, Appellants, v. Frank HANNIGAN; Dorothy Hannigan, aka Dotty Hannigan; Arkate Group, acting by and through Kathleen Whitesell, Ron Du Buc, and Teke Du Buc, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 10, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Leuenberger, Baker City, argued the cause and filed the briefs, for appellants.

A.J. Schmeits, Baker City, argued the cause, for respondents Frank Hannigan and Dorothy Hannigan. With him on the brief was Silven, Schmeits & Vaughan.

No appearance for respondent Arkate Group.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and BREWER and SCHUMAN, Judges.

SCHUMAN, J.

Plaintiffs and defendants sought to quiet title to the Pete Mann Ditch.1 Plaintiffs appealed from a judgment that dismissed their claims and defendants' counterclaims. We review de novo, ORS 105.605; ORS 19.415(3); Nedry v. Morgan, 284 Or. 65, 67 n. 1, 584 P.2d 1381 (1978), and affirm.2

A series of ditches, approximately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases