Contrary to respondent Metropolitan Life's contention, the petition was timely. Nonetheless, the petition should be dismissed since our review of the record discloses that the Commissioner's findings, that petitioner was not subjected to sexual harassment and that respondent met its burden to demonstrate non-discriminatory reasons for petitioner's termination, were supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF EDINBORO v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
289 A.D.2d 123 (2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 173
In the Matter of C. CLAIRE EDINBORO, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 18, 2001.
Decided December 18, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.