1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 33 P.3d
  5. 33 P.3d 377 (2001)
 

BASMACI v. THE STANLEY WORKS

98-10143; A109614

33 P.3d 377 (2001)

177 Or. App. 102

In the Matter of the Compensation of Metin Basmaci, Claimant. Metin BASMACI, Petitioner, v. THE STANLEY WORKS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 3, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Hill argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Willner Wren Hill & U'ren, Portland.

Jerald Keene, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge.

WOLLHEIM, J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board, raising multiple assignments of error. We affirm without discussion all assignments of error except for the assignment of error concerning interim compensation, attorney fees,1 and penalties.

The facts will be abbreviated because we write on only one assignment of error. Beginning in 1995, claimant sought medical treatment for his feet....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases