1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 254 F.3d
  5. 254 F.3d 156 (2001)
 

FREDRICK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. 99-7229.

254 F.3d 156 (2001)

Andrew M. FREDRICK, et al., Appellees, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 26, 2001.

Rehearing Denied August 10, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl J. Schifferle, Assistant Corporation Counsel, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Robert R. Rigsby, Corporation Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel. Lutz Alexander Prager, Assistant Deputy Corporation Counsel, entered an appearance.

Janet R. Cooper argued the cause and filed the brief for appellees.

Before: HENDERSON, RANDOLPH and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.

RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:

Andrew M. Fredrick, Stephen Bias and Michael J. Hairston sued the District of Columbia, alleging that the District had discriminated against black employees of the Metropolitan Police Department, in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The first trial ended in a hung jury. After a second trial held in May 1999, the jury found...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases