1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 348 S.C.
  5. 348 S.C. 58 (2001)
 

BINKLEY v. RABON CREEK WATERSHED CONSERV.

No. 3411.

348 S.C. 58 (2001)

558 S.E.2d 902

Robert W. BINKLEY and Susan B. Binkley, Respondents, v. RABON CREEK WATERSHED CONSERVATION DISTRICT OF FOUNTAIN INN, South Carolina, Appellant. Robert W. Binkley and Susan B. Binkley, Respondents, v. John Burry; Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Guerard, LLP; Donald A. Harper; Greenville County; and Fant Engineering & Surveying Co., Inc., Defendants, and Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Guerard, LLP, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation District of Fountain Inn, South Carolina, Appellant. John N. Lopresti and Janice M. Lopresti, Plaintiffs, v. John Burry, Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation District of Fountain Inn, South Carolina, Everette H. Babb, Fredrick E. Landrith, Landrith Surveying, Inc., and Greenville County, Defendants. Steven W. McConnell, Plaintiff, v. John Burry, Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation District of Fountain Inn, South Carolina, and T.H. Walker, Jr., Defendants. David Hearn and Debbie Hearn, Plaintiffs, v. Timothy Farr, John Burry, and the County of Greenville, South Carolina, Defendants. Robert W. Binkley and Susan B. Binkley, Respondents, v. John Burry; Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Guerard, LLP; Donald A. Harper; Greenville County; and Fant Engineering & Surveying Co., Inc., Defendants, and Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Guerard, LLP, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation District of Fountain Inn, South Carolina, Appellant. Mitchell and Rebecca King and Arlin and Maxine Verley, Plaintiffs, v. John Burry, Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation District of Fountain Inn, South Carolina; The United States of America; The United States Department of Agriculture; The County of Laurens; The Laurens Soil and Water Conservation District; The County of Greenville; and The Greenville County Soil and Water Conservation District, Defendants, of whom John Burry and Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation District of Fountain Inn, South Carolina are Appellants, and John N. Lopresti, Janice M. Lopresti, Steven W. McConnell, David Hearn, Debbie Hearn, T.H. Walker, Jr., Timothy Farr, Robert W. Binkley, Susan B. Binkley, Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Guerard, LLP, Donald A. Harper, Mitchell and Rebecca King and Arlin and Maxine Verley are Respondents.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided November 19, 2001.

Rehearing Denied February 6, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew F. Lindemann, of Davidson, Morrison & Lindemann, of Columbia; and John R. Devlin, Jr., of Greenville; for Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation District of Fountain Inn, SC; and W. Francis Marion, Jr., of Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Guerard, of Greenville, for John Burry, appellants.

David L. Thomas, of Greenville, for David Hearn and Debbie Hearn; Michael S. Chambers, of Greenville; and Keith M. Babcock, of Lewis, Babcock & Hawkins, of Columbia, both for John N. Lopresti, Janice M. Lopresti, Robert W. Binkley and Susan B. Binkley; Samuel W. Outten, of Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, of Greenville, for Timothy Farr; H.W. Pat Pascal, Jr., of Miller & Paschal, of Greenville, for Steven W. McConnell, Mitchell and Rebecca King, Arlin and Maxine Verley; John E. Johnston, of Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, of Greenville, for Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Guerard, LLP; H. Michael Spivey, of Mauldin, for T.H. Walker, Jr.; Donald A. Harper; and N. Heyward Clarkson, of Clarkson, Fortson, Walsh & Rheney, both of Greenville, for Donald A. Harper, respondents.

William G. Walsh, of Simpsonville, for defendant Fant Engineering & Surveying Co., Inc.; John W. Howard, III, for defendant Fredrick E. Landrith, and W. Howard Boyd, Jr., of Gibbs, Gallivan, White & Boyd, for defendant Greenville County, both of Greenville; and Alexander Cruickshanks, IV, of Clinton, for defendant, Laurens County.

GOOLSBY, Judge.

In this declaratory judgment action to determine the extent and enforceability of an easement, Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation District of Fountain Inn1 (Rabon Creek) appeals the grant of a Rule 60(b)(5) motion vacating the final order in Binkley v. Rabon Creek (Binkley I) and the consolidation of Binkley I with Binkley v. Burry (Binkley II) and the other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases