Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. Probable cause for defendant's arrest for the robbery of a jewelry store was established by evidence that defendant's fingerprints were found in an area of the store that had been thoroughly cleaned immediately before the robbery. This evidence would lead a reasonable person to conclude that it was more probable than not that defendant was one of the perpetrators (see, People v Radoncic,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
