BURG v. CINCINNATI CAS. INS. CO.

No. 00-3258.

248 Wis.2d 145 (2001)

2001 WI App 241

635 N.W.2d 622

Karl A. BURG by his legal guardian, Gladys M. Weichert, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CINCINNATI CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. and Robert W. Zimmerman, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided September 11, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Victor C. Harding of Warshafsky, Rotter, Tarnoff, Reinhardt & Bloch, S.C., of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the defendants-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of Gregory J. Cook of Kasdorf, Lewis & Swietlik, S.C., of Milwaukee.

Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Schudson and Curley, JJ.


¶ 1. SCHUDSON, J.

Karl A. Burg, by his legal guardian, Gladys M. Weichert, appeals from the judgment, following a jury trial, dismissing his action against Robert W. Zimmerman and Zimmerman's insurer, Cincinnati Casualty Insurance Co.1 Burg argues that the trial court erred in concluding that Zimmerman's conduct in the operation of a snowmobile was not negligent per se, and that the jury's damages verdict was perverse. Burg is correct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases