1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 263 F.3d
  5. 263 F.3d 129 (2001)
 

MOSEMAN v. VAN LEER

No. 00-2072.

263 F.3d 129 (2001)

Richard N. Moseman, an individual; Daniel Rousseau, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Blake Van Leer, an individual; Garnet, Incorporated; Garnet of Virginia, Incorporated, now known as King George Landfill, Incorporated; Garnet of Maryland, Incorporated; Garnet Enterprises, Incorporated; Cross Road Trail, Incorporated; Rollins Avenue, Incorporated; King George Land Company, Incorporated; BKJB Partnership, a Georgia corporation; Robert D. Cheeley, an individual; James E. Butler, Jr., an individual; Bobby M. Thomas, an individual; Keith R. Breedlove, an individual, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: August 27, 2001

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Geoffrey P. Gitner, Law Offices of Geoffrey P. Gitner, Washington, DC, for Appellants. James Strother Crockett, Jr., Troutman, Sanders, Mays & Valentine, L.L.P., Richmond, VA; Andrew David Levy, Brown, Goldstein & Levy, L.L.P., Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

ON BRIEF: Stephen A. Northup, Robert A. Angle, Troutman, Sanders, Mays & Valentine, L.L.P., Richmond, VA William G. Broaddus, Ronald M. Cherry, Erik C. Martini, McGuire Woods, L.L.P., Richmond, VA, Thomas M. Wood, IV, Neuberger, Quinn, Gielen, Rubin & Gibber, P.A., Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, KING, Circuit Judge, and BEEZER, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge BEEZER wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judge KING joined.

OPINION

BEEZER, Senior Circuit Judge:

Richard Moseman and Daniel Rousseau appeal the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants. Plaintiffs' claims are based on common law fraud and on federal and state securities statutes. We have jurisdiction and we affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases