Defendant concedes that the hearing court's original denial of a Dunaway hearing was correct because his moving papers were devoid of necessary sworn factual allegations. He contends, however, that either the hearing or trial courts (this conviction arises out of a retrial) should have granted a Dunaway hearing because the defect in his moving papers was allegedly cured by testimony at the pretrial Wade/Huntley hearing as well as by trial testimony. Defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
